Mehdi Hasan, a political commentator and journalist, has recently exposed a Democrat who has received support from some of Donald Trump’s biggest backers. The story has caused controversy and raised questions about the role of money in politics.

The Democrat in question is Congressman Ro Khanna, who represents California’s 17th congressional district. Khanna has been a rising star in the Democratic Party and has been praised for his progressive views on issues such as healthcare, education, and the environment. However, according to Hasan, Khanna’s campaign has been receiving donations from some unexpected sources.

Hasan’s investigation found that Khanna’s campaign has received donations from individuals and organizations with ties to Donald Trump. These include Peter Thiel, a billionaire venture capitalist and Trump supporter, and the Mercer family, who are major donors to Republican causes. Khanna has also received donations from employees of Palantir Technologies, a data-mining firm co-founded by Thiel.

The donations have raised questions about Khanna’s political allegiances and whether he is truly committed to progressive values. Hasan argues that Khanna cannot claim to be a progressive while taking money from Trump supporters and their allies. He also suggests that Khanna may be trying to appeal to a broader base of voters in order to secure his position in Congress.

Khanna has responded to the allegations by saying that he welcomes donations from individuals of all political persuasions. He argues that he is a unifier who is able to bring people together from across the political spectrum. He also says that he has a record of standing up to Donald Trump and his allies, including voting to impeach the former president.

The controversy surrounding Khanna’s campaign raises broader questions about the role of money in politics. Many progressives argue that the influence of big donors is a major obstacle to real change, and that politicians who take money from wealthy individuals and corporations are unlikely to represent the interests of ordinary people.

There are also concerns about the impact of big money on the Democratic Party. Some progressives worry that the party is becoming too dependent on wealthy donors, and that this could lead to a watering down of its progressive agenda.

Hasan’s investigation has sparked a debate about these issues, with many progressives calling for greater transparency and accountability in political fundraising. They argue that voters have a right to know who is funding political campaigns, and that politicians should be held accountable for the donations they receive.

Overall, the controversy surrounding Ro Khanna’s campaign highlights the complex relationship between money and politics. While donations from wealthy individuals and organizations can be a valuable source of funding for political campaigns, they can also raise questions about a candidate’s commitment to their values and their ability to represent the interests of all constituents. As the debate over money in politics continues, it is likely that we will see more investigations like Mehdi Hasan’s, as progressives seek to hold politicians accountable and promote greater transparency in the political process.